|
CASE STUDY
"Father Joe" • Relapse Prevention
Rev. James Gordon is a licensed psychologist
and therapist at SLI.
Fr. Joe, a religious order priest, has been ordained
for 20 years and is the pastor of an active medium sized parish.
It is important to him to be successful because this is his first
pastorate. Prior to this assignment, he has held responsible positions
in various ministries and has served in positions of leadership within
the order. Fr. Joe has a history of alcoholic drinking and failed
attempts at sobriety. Most recently, his order’s leadership
team received reports from Fr. Joe’s parishioners that he was
drunk in public and that they were worried about his safety and physical
health. Following an intervention that included family members whom
Fr. Joe loves and trusts, and under the threat of having his faculties
removed, he reluctantly agreed to an evaluation at St. Luke’s.
Fr. Joe came to evaluation angry and resistant, reporting
that the leadership team did not understand his situation and that
he was
being made a scapegoat. The evaluation team questioned whether
Fr. Joe could make use of residential treatment. Over the years he
had
been through a previous inpatient treatment and continued to relapse.
The evaluation team eventually recommended residential treatment.
They also challenged Fr. Joe that he would have to work at understanding
some of the psychological issues undermining his attempts at recovery.
Fr. Joe was angry but agreed to stay for treatment, primarily in
the hope of regaining his faculties so that he could continue in
active ministry.
Fr. Joe’s treatment can be conceptualized within
the framework of relapse prevention. In the past, he was able to
maintain sobriety
for discreet periods of time but never focused on underlying problem
areas related to his alcoholism. For example, the order had received
information that Fr. Joe engaged in sexually inappropriate contact
with adults. Fr. Joe initially denied that this was an area of
concern and began treatment denying that these sexual concerns had
anything
to do with his drinking. He also was resistant to exploring the
connection between his anger, especially at authorities, and his
repeated relapses
after previous interventions and treatments.
Relapse prevention envisions relapses not as isolated
events but as a process. People are less likely to relapse if they
are able
to name specific triggering events that put them at higher risk
for relapse and to develop skills to cope with these situations
in new
ways. Studies have indicated that there are a number of internal
and external variables related to relapse. Peer or social pressure
seems to impact Fr. Joe, as he has little capacity to refuse
the offer of a glass of wine at a dinner party because he feels shamed
by the experience. Other potent variables relating to relapse
involve
negative emotional states that include depression, loneliness,
boredom, and a lack of time structure as well as interpersonal
conflict with
significant others that result in anger and resentment (Donovan
and Marlatt, 2005). An individual is much more likely to relapse
if these
issues are not addressed in therapy.
In the course of his residential treatment, Fr. Joe
addressed family of origin issues, especially his anger and disappointment
in his
relationship with his mother. He always felt that his mother
favored his siblings and that he was scapegoated in the family.
He came
to realize that his unresolved anger at his mother made its
way
into
his relationships with authority figures. He could become enraged
when he felt dismissed, overlooked, or scapegoated by those
in positions of power within the order. Because these feelings were
linked with
his past, they could not be resolved in his current relationships.
Fr. Joe often felt angry and misunderstood, and he soothed
those
feelings by drinking. In the course of treatment, he identified
exchanges with authority figures and more specifically, the
resultant anger,
as key triggers in past relapses. As he brought to light family
conflicts and worked the feelings in therapy, he was able to
resolve current
conflicts more adaptably.
Fr. Joe also realized that during adolescence he
felt belittled by his older brothers about his sexual identity. They
made
disparaging remarks that were quite shaming, insinuating
that Joe was not
masculine enough. Fr. Joe felt a great deal of shame and,
as a result, had
never allowed himself to explore his own sexual identity.
He entered religious life at eighteen and thought this commitment
closed the
door on his sexual thoughts and feelings. Later in life,
while
drinking,
he began to act out his unintegrated sexual feelings. The
only time that Fr. Joe allowed himself access to his sexual feelings
was when
he was drunk. Conversely, he would drink in order to allow
himself these feelings. In therapy, Fr. Joe first found the
courage to
understand and explore the roots of his anger and his issues
with authority.
This, in turn, opened the door for him to address his sexual
feelings in a way that lessened the shame he had so long
experienced.
Fr. Joe now realizes that his long- standing unresolved
angry and sexual feelings have triggered past relapses. In addition
to his
12-step program, Fr. Joe used therapy to explore the roots
of these difficulties. He now names conflicts and difficult
feelings
as
potential relapse triggers and has incorporated strategies
to deal with them
into his relapse prevention plan. In addition, he has committed
himself to chaste living and the ongoing work of sexual
integration
as part
of his recovery.
LUKENOTES
is a bimonthly publication of Saint Luke Institute.
Permission to use these materials must be requested in writing by contacting
lukenotes@sli.org
SLI
EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
Saint Luke Institute
8901 New Hampshire Ave.
Silver Spring, MD 20903
(301) 422-5499 • (301) 422-5519 (fax)
back
to top
|